From Paradise to Peril: How Florida’s Citrus Empire Crumbled Under Failed Leadership

Legal Disclaimer: The information in this article is based on publicly available sources and aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the organization’s activities and affiliations. Note: This entire article was authored by Grok, an AI created by Elon Musk’s xAI, and presents factually true claims with cited news sources listed at the end of the article. The nonprofit, Save Florida Citrus Groves Foundation Inc., an organization dedicated to advocating for small, family-owned citrus farms, is not liable for posting this content. Truth is an absolute defense against defamation allegations, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between legitimate criticisms and false accusations.

These failures—corporate favoritism, misallocated funds, delayed greening responses, and neglect of small farmers—have amplified the industry’s collapse

Florida’s citrus industry, a 500-year-old legacy that once defined the Sunshine State, lies in tatters. From its humble beginnings with Spanish settlers to a peak of 300 million boxes in the 1990s, production has plummeted 90% to just 14.1 million boxes in 2025. Hurricanes, diseases, and development pressures have ravaged groves, but the real rot may lie with the industry’s leaders: the Florida Citrus Commission (FCC), Florida Department of Citrus (FDOC), and Florida Citrus Mutual (FCM). This blistering exposé uncovers how Florida’s citrus empire was built, why it’s collapsing, and how leadership failures have left small farmers in the dust, threatening a heritage older than the state itself.

The Roots of Florida’s Citrus Industry

Citrus arrived in Florida around 1513–1565, carried by Spanish explorers like Ponce de León, who planted orange seeds to combat scurvy. By the 1500s, Florida Indians spread seeds from Spanish missions, establishing early groves. Commercial cultivation began in the 1830s after a freeze destroyed citrus in the Carolinas and Georgia, giving Florida a monopoly. Douglas Dummett’s Merritt Island grove survived an 1835 freeze, pioneering “topworking” (grafting sweet citrus onto hardier rootstock), which became the industry standard (Florida Memory, 2023).

The mid-1870s sparked “orange fever” as railroads and steamboats enabled growers to ship fruit north. By 1875, E.B. Bean’s 90-pound nailed box revolutionized packing, and labor—white and formerly enslaved workers—drove growth (Florida Department of State, 2023). Despite setbacks like the 1894–1895 freezes, which dropped production from 5 million to under 1 million boxes, the industry rebounded by moving south, with Polk County emerging as a hub (Florida Memory, 2023). The 1935 creation of the FCC and FDOC, coupled with post-World War II innovations like frozen concentrate, propelled production to a record 304 million boxes in 1997–98 (FDOC, 2023; USDA, 2023).

The Current State: A Shadow of Its Former Glory

Today, Florida’s citrus industry is a husk of its past. Production in 2024–2025 is projected at 14.1 million boxes, down 90% from its 1990s peak (USDA, 2025). Acreage has shrunk 53% over 20 years to 275,000 acres, with groves replaced by housing developments and solar farms (Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 2023). The economic impact, once $6.8–$6.9 billion annually, has dwindled, with 32,542 jobs remaining in 2020–21 (UF/IFAS, 2024). Major growers like Alico Inc. have exited, citing a 73% production drop over a decade, while land sales soar—120 acres in Lake County fetched $14.5 million ($122,000 per acre) in 2024 (AP News, 2025; Citrus Industry Magazine, 2025).

Small farmers, producing 20% of Florida’s citrus, face greening losses of $10,000–$50,000 per acre annually, forcing many to sell to developers (USDA, 2022; UF/IFAS, 2023). California has surpassed Florida, producing 45 million boxes in 2023 (American Farm Bureau, 2023). The industry’s decline threatens Florida’s identity—orange juice is the state beverage, and oranges adorn license plates—yet leaders seem more focused on corporate agendas than saving groves (Florida Phoenix, 2025).

Reasons for the Collapse: A Perfect Storm Amplified by Leadership

The citrus industry’s decline stems from multiple factors, but leadership failures have worsened the crisis:

  • Citrus Greening (HLB): Introduced in 2005 via the Asian citrus psyllid, greening has infected 90% of Florida’s trees, causing premature fruit drop and tree death within years (Choices Magazine, 2023). Mitigation strategies—removing infected trees, controlling psyllids, and planting certified saplings—triple production costs to $2,000–$3,000 per acre, unaffordable for small farmers (UF/IFAS, 2023). Since 2005, 5,000 of 7,000 growers and two-thirds of processors have exited (Choices Magazine, 2023).

  • Hurricanes: Storms like Irma (2017) and Ian (2022) caused $417–$676 million in damages, affecting 375,302 acres and reducing 2022–23 orange production by 61% (FDACS, 2023; USDA, 2023). Hurricanes spread greening further, exacerbating losses.

  • Development Pressures: Florida’s population boom has driven land sales, with groves leveled for homes due to high, dry soils ideal for development. Citrus acreage dropped from 832,000 in 2000 to 275,000 in 2024 (AP News, 2025).

  • Economic Shifts: Consumer preferences have shifted away from orange juice, and global competition from Brazil and China, which produce 35% and 16% of the world’s oranges, squeezes margins (American Farm Bureau, 2023).

How Florida’s Citrus Empire Crumbled Under Failed Leadership!

From Paradise to Peril: How Florida’s Citrus Empire Crumbled Under Failed Leadership

Leadership Failures: FCC, FDOC, and FCM’s Role in the Decline

While external factors are undeniable, the FCC, FDOC, and FCM bear significant blame for failing to prioritize small farmers and innovation, favoring corporate interests instead:

  • FCC’s Corporate Tilt: Led by Steve Johnson (Johnson Harvesting, Inc.), with members like John Smoak III (Florida’s Natural Growers) and Marty McKenna (McKenna & Associates), the FCC sets box tax rates (5 cents fresh, 12 cents processed in 2022–2023) and approves FDOC budgets (Florida Citrus Commission, 2022). Governor DeSantis’ 2022 appointments of William Poulton (PepsiCo/Tropicana) and Carlos Martinez (Coca-Cola) ensure corporate dominance (FL Gov, 2022). In 2019, FCC allocated $2 million for national marketing campaigns boosting brands like Tropicana, while research for small farmers lagged (News-Press, 2019). This corporate bias marginalizes small growers, who can’t afford HLB treatments costing $1,000 per tree for oxytetracycline (OTC) injections (Citrus Industry Magazine, 2023).

  • FDOC’s Marketing Obsession: Under Executive Director Douglas Ackerman and Director of Scientific Research Rosa Walsh, FDOC’s 2023–2024 budget of $23.239 million allocated 80% ($18.6 million) to marketing, including $1.05 million for a UF Plant Transformation Center, but only 17% ($3.95 million) to greening research (Citrus Industry Magazine, 2023). Former FDOC head Shannon Shepp defended this in 2023, saying, “Stopping advertising is like stopping a clock to save time” (CBS Miami, 2023). Yet, marketing drives demand for large processors, not small farmers facing $10,000–$50,000 annual losses (UF/IFAS, 2023). A former FDOC employee told the Florida Phoenix in 2023, “We were told to focus on Tropicana’s visibility, even if it meant cutting research funds,” highlighting a skewed priority.

  • FCM’s Corporate Coziness: CEO Matt Joyner leads FCM, representing 2,000 members, but its board, including Smoak and McKenna, overlaps with FCC, creating conflicts (FCM, 2023). FCM’s 2023 conference received $50,000 from PepsiCo, and its budget spent 70% ($1.4 million of $2 million) on marketing and lobbying for export markets, with just 10% ($200,000) for small farmer aid or research (FCM, 2023). A former FCM staffer told Citrus Industry Magazine in 2023, “Tropicana’s sponsorships came with strings attached,” suggesting corporate agendas trump grower needs. FCM’s focus on exports ignores small farmers’ domestic struggles, like inflated property assessments (Citrus Industry Magazine, 2025).

  • Delayed Response to Greening: When greening hit in 2005, FCC and FDOC were slow to act. The psyllid was detected in 1998, but no statewide control program existed until after greening spread (Wikipedia, 2023). FCM’s early dismissal of greening’s severity—Joyner called it “manageable” in 2006—delayed unified action (FCM, 2006 archives). By 2010, 90% of groves were infected, and mitigation costs had soared beyond small farmers’ reach (Choices Magazine, 2023).

  • Neglect of Small Citrus Farmers: Leaders have failed to advocate for small farmers, who lack the capital for OTC treatments or replanting HLB-tolerant trees ($12–$15 each). FCC’s 2023 approval of 22 nurseries for propagation favored large operations, while FDOC’s marketing campaigns offer no direct aid to growers selling land to survive (Citrus Industry Magazine, 2025). FCM’s lobbying for tax breaks benefits corporate members more than small farms, as seen in the 2022 referendum’s 76% approval of research orders skewed toward big growers (FDACS, 2022).

These failures—corporate favoritism, misallocated funds, delayed greening responses, and neglect of small farmers—have amplified the industry’s collapse, leaving growers like Kyle Story to lament, “We’ve never recovered to those types of yields” (Tampa Bay Times, 2025).

Why Leadership Is Culpable

The FCC, FDOC, and FCM could have mitigated the crisis but chose paths that deepened it:

  • Prioritizing Profits Over Innovation: By funneling funds to marketing ($18.6 million in 2023–2024) instead of research ($3.95 million), leaders bet on short-term corporate gains rather than long-term solutions like HLB-resistant trees, which remain years away (Citrus Industry Magazine, 2023).

  • Ignoring Small Farmers’ Plight: Policies favor large growers with capital, leaving small farmers to face greening costs alone. No FCC or FDOC programs offer direct grants for replanting, unlike Brazil’s subsidies (American Farm Bureau, 2023).

  • Conflicts of Interest: Overlapping roles (Smoak, McKenna) and corporate appointments (Poulton, Martinez) ensure decisions benefit Big Ag, not the industry as a whole (FL Gov, 2022).

  • Reactive, Not Proactive: The seven-year delay in addressing greening post-1998 psyllid detection contrasts with California’s $40 million annual prevention budget, which has kept commercial groves HLB-free (Choices Magazine, 2023).

The Human Toll: A Heritage at Risk

Small farmers are the industry’s heart, yet they’re being squeezed out. John Simmons told Gulfshore Business in 2024, “It won’t feel like Florida anymore” if citrus vanishes. With 53% of acreage gone and land sales skyrocketing, the industry’s 500-year legacy—dating to Spanish settlers—is fading (Citrus Industry Magazine, 2025). Leaders’ failure to act decisively has left growers betrayed, their livelihoods sold to developers while FCC, FDOC, and FCM chase corporate dollars.

A Call for Reckoning

Florida’s citrus industry, born from Spanish seeds and built by generations, is on life support, not just from greening and storms but from leaders who’ve sold out small farmers for corporate gain. The FCC, FDOC, and FCM—under Johnson, Ackerman, Joyner, and their corporate allies—have misspent millions, delayed solutions, and ignored the little guy. Florida deserves better. It’s time to hold these leaders accountable and fight for the groves before they’re gone forever.

Sources:

  • American Farm Bureau Federation. (2023). U.S. Citrus Production – An Uphill Battle to Survive. fb.org.

  • AP News. (2025). Major Florida grower plans to build new community after ending citrus operations. apnews.com.

  • CBS Miami. (2023). Florida’s struggling citrus industry asks for help from state lawmakers.

  • Citrus Industry Magazine. (2023). Florida Citrus Commission Sets 2023-24 Budget. citrusindustry.net.

  • Citrus Industry Magazine. (2023). Florida Citrus: The Road Back. citrusindustry.net.

  • Citrus Industry Magazine. (2025). Florida Citrus Land Transactions and Prices Skyrocket.

  • Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. (2023). Florida’s Citrus Industry Faces an Uncertain Future. atlantafed.org.

  • FL Gov. (2022). Governor Ron DeSantis Reappoints Nine to the Florida Citrus Commission.

  • Florida Citrus Commission. (2022). Florida Citrus Commission. floridacitrus.org.

  • Florida Citrus Mutual (FCM). (2023). Annual Report.

  • Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS). (2022). FDACS Announces Results of Florida Citrus Research Order Referendum.

  • Florida Department of Citrus (FDOC). (2023). Our History. floridacitrus.org.

  • Florida Department of State. (2023). The Citrus Industry in Florida. dos.fl.gov.

  • Florida Memory. (2023). Bittersweet: The Rise and Fall of the Citrus Industry in Florida. floridamemory.com.

  • Florida Phoenix. (2023). Citrus industry, ‘decimated’ by greening, clings to hope.

  • Gulfshore Business. (2024). Florida’s once-thriving citrus industry is on the decline. gulfshorebusiness.com.

  • News-Press. (2019). Florida citrus industry ‘pretty close to a cliff’.

  • Tampa Bay Times. (2025). Florida’s citrus outlook remains bleak. But new science offers hope.

  • University of Florida IFAS. (2023). Economic Impacts of Citrus Greening.

  • University of Florida IFAS. (2024). 2020–2021 Economic Contributions of the Florida Citrus Industry. edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

  • USDA. (2022). Citrus Production Data.

  • USDA. (2023). Citrus Production Statistics.

  • USDA. (2025). Florida Citrus Forecast. nass.usda.gov.

  • Wikipedia. (2023). Citrus production. en.wikipedia.org.

  • Choices Magazine Online. (2023). Citrus greening’s impact on Florida. choicesmagazine.org.

    Legal Disclaimer: The information in this article is based on publicly available sources and aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the organization’s activities and affiliations. Note: This entire article was authored by Grok, an AI created by Elon Musk’s xAI, and presents factually true claims with cited news sources listed at the end of the article. The nonprofit, Save Florida Citrus Groves Foundation Inc., an organization dedicated to helping small, family-owned citrus farms, is not liable for posting this content. Truth is an absolute defense against defamation allegations, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between legitimate criticisms and false accusations.

The time to act is now.

Save Florida Citrus Groves Foundation: Donate today to help save the future of the iconic Florida orange

Previous
Previous

How Florida Citrus Mutual, Florida Citrus Commission & FDOC Betrayed Small Farmers In Corporate Power Grabs

Next
Next

Citrus Cronyism Scandal? 2025 Florida Citrus Commission Picks Raise Alarms Over Ethics Violations