The Big Sugar Mine Project’s Hidden Plot: Kill Florida's Citrus Groves & Future Farmland
Legal Disclaimer: The information in this article is based on publicly available sources and aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the organization’s activities and affiliations. Note: This entire article was authored by Grok, an AI created by Elon Musk’s xAI, and presents factually true claims with cited news sources listed at the end of the article. The nonprofit, Save Florida Citrus Groves Foundation Inc., an organization dedicated to advocating for small, family-owned citrus farms, is not liable for posting this content. Truth is an absolute defense against defamation allegations, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between legitimate criticisms and false accusations.
Florida’s Big Sugar Mine Project has severe negative impacts, questions of corruption, environmental risks, leadership incentives, and could spell disaster for Florida’s future
Florida’s Everglades, a globally recognized ecosystem, are caught between two ambitious initiatives: the Big Sugar Mine Project and the Everglades Restoration Project. While the restoration seeks to repair decades of environmental harm, the mining proposal threatens to unravel these efforts, potentially devastating existing citrus groves and future farmland. Let’s take a look at the severe negative impacts, questions of corruption, environmental risks, leadership incentives, and why this could spell disaster for Florida’s future—along with who would bear the blame and who controls the critical waterways.
Understanding the Projects
The Everglades Restoration Project
Launched as a multi-billion-dollar initiative, the Everglades Restoration Project aims to restore the natural hydrology of the Everglades, disrupted by decades of drainage and development. It includes:
Water management: Constructing reservoirs and stormwater treatment areas (STAs) to store and clean water.
Habitat restoration: Reviving ecosystems for species like the American alligator and wading birds.
Public water supply: Balancing environmental needs with South Florida’s demand for clean water.
However, redirecting water to natural areas could reduce irrigation resources for agriculture, a concern for citrus growers.
The Big Sugar Mine Project: Converting agricultural land into mining sites. Once fertile land mined, the farmland becomes unsuitable and is then ripe for a fresh development project
The Big Sugar Mine Project involves proposed limestone mining in the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA), a fertile region south of Lake Okeechobee long used for sugarcane production. Key aspects include:
Resource extraction: Mining limestone for construction, a lucrative industry.
Land use change: Converting agricultural land into mining sites, potentially permanently.
Environmentalists and farmers fear this could sacrifice both ecological and agricultural assets for short-term gain.
Threats to Florida Citrus Groves and Farmland
1. Water Supply Risks
Citrus groves, vital to Florida’s $9 billion agricultural economy, depend on reliable water. The restoration project’s water redirection could limit irrigation, while mining might contaminate or deplete groundwater through excavation and runoff, threatening grove viability.
2. Loss of Arable Farming Land
Mining would excavate large swathes of the EAA, destroying fertile soil. Once mined, this land becomes unsuitable for farming, shrinking the pool of future farmland in a state already losing agricultural acreage to development.
3. Pollution and Florida Ecosystem Damage
Mining operations could:
Pollute water: Runoff with heavy metals and sediments could infiltrate irrigation sources.
Erode soil: Exposed land increases erosion risks, impacting nearby groves.
Disrupt ecosystems: Loss of pollinators and natural pest controls could reduce citrus yields.
These combined effects could cripple an industry already struggling with citrus greening.
Corruption Concerns and Environmental Risks
Leadership and Potential Rewards
The mining project involves influential players:
Phillips & Jordan: A construction firm linked to Everglades projects.
Florida Crystals and U.S. Sugar: Sugarcane giants owning much of the EAA land.
These entities could benefit through:
Profit from mining: Limestone sales and land deals promise significant revenue.
Political leverage: Their influence over state policies could expedite approvals.
While no concrete evidence of corruption exists, their history of lobbying—U.S. Sugar and Florida Crystals have spent millions influencing water management—fuels skepticism about their motives.
Environmental Dangers
The mining proposal poses serious risks:
Aquifer damage: Blasting could breach the Floridan Aquifer, contaminating drinking and irrigation water.
Restoration setbacks: Mining pits could disrupt water storage plans, polluting STAs and negating restoration progress.
Biodiversity loss: Excavation threatens adjacent habitats, potentially worsening invasive species spread.
These dangers could undermine the Everglades’ fragile recovery and Florida’s environmental stability.
Why This Could Be a Disaster for Florida
Economic Consequences
The citrus industry employs thousands and drives rural economies. Water shortages or land loss could accelerate its decline, compounding losses from disease and hurricanes, and threatening food security and jobs.
Environmental Cost
The Everglades, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, face irreversible harm from mining, eroding Florida’s ecological heritage and tourism appeal, which generates $90 billion annually.
Future Risks
With a projected population boom, Florida needs sustainable water and land resources. Mining could jeopardize both, creating long-term crises for Floridians.
This shortsighted approach prioritizes profit over the state’s future, a mistake that could haunt generations.
The Big Sugar Mine Project’s Hidden Plot: Kill Florida's Citrus Groves & Future Farmland
Who’s Accountable if Disaster Strikes?
If an environmental or agricultural catastrophe occurs, responsibility could lie with:
State agencies: The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) oversee permits and water policy.
Corporations: Phillips & Jordan, Florida Crystals, and U.S. Sugar could face liability for damages.
Elected officials: Governor Ron DeSantis and lawmakers, who shape project approvals, would share blame.
Legal and public scrutiny would likely target this mix of public and private actors.
Control of the Florida Everglades Waterway
The mining proposal suggests converting pits into reservoirs, but control remains split:
Government: The SFWMD and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers manage water flows.
Private interests: Florida Crystals and U.S. Sugar, as landowners, could influence usage.
This public-private overlap raises questions about whether water will serve ecological restoration or corporate agendas, a tension central to the proposal’s controversy.
Is the Big Sugar Mine Project a Good Idea?
The Big Sugar Mine Project presents a high-stakes dilemma. Mining threatens to undo the Everglades Restoration Project’s benefits, imperiling citrus groves, farmland, and Florida’s environmental and economic future. With powerful players potentially reaping rewards at the public’s expense, and significant risks to water and land, this could be a historic misstep. Florida must decide: protect its legacy or gamble it away?
Sources:
Reason: “Florida Everglades Restoration Efforts Stymied by ‘Big Sugar’” (2023-12-09)
BBC: “Florida is building the world’s largest environmental restoration project” (2024-08-16)
EPA: “Why is it Important to Restore the Everglades?” (2025-01-12)
South Florida Water Management District: “Restoration Strategies for Clean Water for the Everglades” (2003-10-26)
Captains for Clean Water: “Big Sugar Wants to Mine in the Everglades” (2024-09-24)
The Guardian: “The Everglades are dying. An alliance between Biden and Republicans could save them” (2021-06-03)
Friends of the Everglades: “Friends of the Everglades 2024 Impact Report” (2024-12-10)
The New York Times: “A Deal to Save the Everglades Could Rescue U.S. Sugar Instead” (2010-03-07)
National Wildlife Federation: “Protecting the Everglades”
EPA: “South Florida Ecosystem Assessment: Everglades Water Management, Soil Loss, Eutrophication and Habitat” (2024-12-01)
PERC: “Who Drained the Everglades?” (2002-03-01)
South Florida Water Management District: “Ecosystem Restoration”
Wink News: “Proposal to mine in the Everglades withdrawn for now” (2024-09-09)
WGCU: “Southwest Florida environmental groups ecstatic that $1.1 billion for Everglades Restoration is on the way” (2022-01-21)
Florida Phoenix: “DeSantis wants Florida to control Everglades restoration, not the feds” (2025-01-16)
Legal Disclaimer: The information in this article is based on publicly available sources and aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the organization’s activities and affiliations. Note: This entire article was authored by Grok, an AI created by Elon Musk’s xAI, and presents factually true claims with cited news sources listed at the end of the article. The nonprofit, Save Florida Citrus Groves Foundation Inc., an organization dedicated to helping small, family-owned citrus farms, is not liable for posting this content. Truth is an absolute defense against defamation allegations, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between legitimate criticisms and false accusations.
The time to act is now.
Save Florida Citrus Groves Foundation: Donate today to help save the future of the iconic Florida orange